Port upgrade: www/firefox. Added GUI selection support
Adam Weinberger
adamw at magnesium.net
Wed Jun 15 20:35:12 GMT 2005
Michael Johnson wrote:
>
> On Jun 15, 2005, at 2:28 PM, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 15 Jun 2005 05:06:24 -0500, Erich Dollansky
>> <oceanare at pacific.net.sg> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Jeremy Messenger wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, 15 Jun 2005 04:09:33 -0500, Erich Dollansky
>>>> <oceanare at pacific.net.sg> wrote:
>>>> That's reason why we should kill GTK1, because of no support and
>>>> no maintain for years. Avoid the world to have full of worms & co.
>>>> from it.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> So, you say we should continue to give the poor people here our old
>>> machines with Windows as this allows at least browsing with Internet
>>> Explorer?
>>>
>>
>
> on OLDER versions of windows. you could always download an older
> version of freebsd and run an older version of firefox.
>
>> Uh? Aren't we talking about FreeBSD?
>>
>>
>>>> 3) Use the different browser.
>>>>
>>>
>>> This is what we currently do, but it ain't no FreeBSD browser.
>>>
>>
>> Please, there have plenty of different browser for Linux/FreeBSD.
>> lynx, link, dillo, opera, and goes on...
>>
>>
>>> Erich
This discussion is getting silly. Someone needs to make a decision, and
someone needs to commit it. I'm on vacation, so I'm not committing right
now, but I will make a decision about this (follow it as you wish):
* gtk12 support will *not* be added. We don't build gtk12 support into
other apps, and we won't here.
* Xlib/no-XUL support *will* be added. This should give people a nice
option for slower machines who don't want to be bogged down by a GTK2
dependency. Note, however, that the FreeBSD GNOME team all uses GTK2, so
the Xlib-only option won't get much committer testing in all likelihood.
Mezz, ahze, do either of you want to commit this?
# Adam
--
Adam Weinberger
adamw at magnesium.net || adamw at FreeBSD.org
adamw at vectors.cx || adamw at gnome.org
http://www.vectors.cx
More information about the freebsd-gnome
mailing list