RFC: Restructuring GNOME meta-ports

[Pav Lucistnik]

V út, 06. 01. 2004 v 04:04, Joe Marcus Clarke píše:

> > gnome2-h4x0r-t00lz i like though. still not thrilled with the name
> > though.
> 
> We can certainly try to come up with a better name.  And don't forget,
> we still have the COMMENT and pkg-descr to help users out.

What about gnome2-developer or gnome2-development or
gnome2-developers-toolbox?

> > I'd like to see maybe an entertainment category. Totem, rhythmbox,
> > xchat2, gossip, gnomeicu2, etc. Maybe a systemtools category that
> > contains gftp, gnomenetwork, etc. Dunno where all of this leaves gkrellm
> > and gdesklets, but I think that they should be in the same category.
> > Besides, gdesklets seems to be becoming more popular than gkrellm2,
> > development of which seems to have slowed to a halt.

That's because gkrellm perfectly achieved the goal it set itself.

> Cool.  Pav also suggested a games meta-port (e.g. gnome2-toys).  We
> should also not think of our new meta-ports as being set in stone.  We
> should allow for flexibility.  For example, as gdesklets matures, it
> could move from power-tools (or whatever) to the fifth-toe, etc.

I like gnome-toys, maybe put gdesklets there too.

-- 
Pav Lucistnik <pav at oook.cz>
Co vime o lasce? Laska je jako hruska. Hruska je sladka a ma urcity
tvar. Zkuste presne definovat tvar hrusky.
  -- Marigold: Pul stoleti poezie

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: Toto je =?iso-8859-2?Q?digit=E1ln=EC?=
	=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_podepsan=E1?= =?iso-8859-2?Q?_=E8=E1st?=
	=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_zpr=E1vy?=
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-gnome/attachments/20040106/a14cf890/attachment.bin