bsdinstall-amd64-20110313 remarks

[Lars Engels]

On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 09:25:36AM +0100, Michael Reifenberger wrote:
> Hi,
> yesterday I tested the images listed in the subject and have the following 
> remarks:
> 
> - At least the memstick image contains an empty fstab
> - Does the usage of a "dangerously dedikated disklabel" give any advantage?
> - The usage of an UFS-Label for root mounting should be more flexible
- UFS-labeling does not work

I let bsdinstall partition the disk automatically and edited the
proposed partitions to add labels, but after the first boot, neither
fstab nor /dev/label showed any labels.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/attachments/20110321/09f0ec0b/attachment.pgp