ACLS on UFS2 from FreeBSD 5.1-RELEASE install.

[Daniel C. Sobral]

Terry Lambert wrote:
> "Daniel C. Sobral" wrote:
> 
>>You'll also notice I'm not questioning the _existence_ of ACL. My point
>>is that FreeBSD is Unix (no matter what the lawyers say), and people
>>don't usually think of ACL when they think of Unix. Ergo, enabling ACL
>>by defautl violates POLA.
> 
> 
> Not if you never *set* an ACL on anything.  It's only when there
> are ACL's set on things that POLA may be violated.

Which is fine if there's no one else on the machine... :-)

> One presumes that an ACL has to be set on purpose...

By _someone_, at at any rate. :-)

>>And, in FreeBSD, POLA is king.
>>
>>(Or so we used to believe, no matter what we actually did. :)
> 
> I'd be astonished if that weren't true.  8-) 8-).
> 
> -- Terry


-- 
Daniel C. Sobral                   (8-DCS)
Gerencia de Operacoes
Divisao de Comunicacao de Dados
Coordenacao de Seguranca
VIVO Centro Oeste Norte
Fones: 55-61-313-7654/Cel: 55-61-9618-0904
E-mail: Daniel.Capo at tco.net.br
         Daniel.Sobral at tcoip.com.br
         dcs at tcoip.com.br

Outros:
	dcs at newsguy.com
	dcs at freebsd.org
	capo at notorious.bsdconspiracy.net

Hoffer's Discovery:
	The grand act of a dying institution is to issue a newly
	revised, enlarged edition of the policies and procedures manual.