ACLS on UFS2 from FreeBSD 5.1-RELEASE install.
Terry Lambert
tlambert2 at mindspring.com
Fri Aug 8 00:31:27 PDT 2003
"Daniel C. Sobral" wrote:
> You'll also notice I'm not questioning the _existence_ of ACL. My point
> is that FreeBSD is Unix (no matter what the lawyers say), and people
> don't usually think of ACL when they think of Unix. Ergo, enabling ACL
> by defautl violates POLA.
Not if you never *set* an ACL on anything. It's only when there
are ACL's set on things that POLA may be violated.
One presumes that an ACL has to be set on purpose...
> And, in FreeBSD, POLA is king.
>
> (Or so we used to believe, no matter what we actually did. :)
I'd be astonished if that weren't true. 8-) 8-).
-- Terry
More information about the freebsd-current
mailing list