To that create a FAQ that says no be unreliable?

[Jorge Luis Carvalho Santos]

> From: freebsd-chat-local at be-well.ilk.org
> To: jorgeassembler1 at outlook.com
> Subject: Re: To that create a FAQ that says no be unreliable?
> Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 16:52:39 -0400
> CC: freebsd-chat at freebsd.org
> 
> Jorge Luis Carvalho Santos <jorgeassembler1 at outlook.com> writes:
> 
> >> From: jorgeassembler1 at outlook.com
> >> To: freebsd-chat at freebsd.org
> >> Subject: To that create a FAQ that says no be unreliable?
> >> Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 18:27:03 +0300
> >> 
> >> Is written in OpenBSD FAQ:"One important difference between OpenBSD
> >> and many other operating systems is the documentation. OpenBSD
> >> developers take great pride in the system man pages. The man pages
> >> are the authoritative source of OpenBSD documentation -- not this
> >> FAQ, not third-party independently maintained pages, not "HOWTO"s,
> >> etc. "
> >> To that create a FAQ that says no be unreliable? 
> >
> > because no one responds? 		 	   		  
> 
> I see no reason to disagree with OpenBSD's FAQ answer.
> I would give the same answer for FreeBSD, 
> although maybe not quite as strongly.
> _______________________________________________


You understand Portuguese of Brazil ?If no, the that made to understand?