To that create a FAQ that says no be unreliable?

[Lowell Gilbert]

Jorge Luis Carvalho Santos <jorgeassembler1 at outlook.com> writes:

>> From: jorgeassembler1 at outlook.com
>> To: freebsd-chat at freebsd.org
>> Subject: To that create a FAQ that says no be unreliable?
>> Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 18:27:03 +0300
>> 
>> Is written in OpenBSD FAQ:"One important difference between OpenBSD
>> and many other operating systems is the documentation. OpenBSD
>> developers take great pride in the system man pages. The man pages
>> are the authoritative source of OpenBSD documentation -- not this
>> FAQ, not third-party independently maintained pages, not "HOWTO"s,
>> etc. "
>> To that create a FAQ that says no be unreliable? 
>
> because no one responds? 		 	   		  

I see no reason to disagree with OpenBSD's FAQ answer.
I would give the same answer for FreeBSD, 
although maybe not quite as strongly.