what can i do with a 486?

deeptech71 at gmail.com deeptech71 at gmail.com
Thu Apr 5 19:41:39 UTC 2007


Oliver Fromme wrote:
> deeptech71 at gmail.com wrote:
>  > I've just tested dangerously dedicated mode, and it worked!
>  > Next stop: it can't load the kernel (only on the 486).
>  > 
>  > --- PART OF OUTPUT:
>  > Loading /boot/defaults/loader.conf
>  > /boot/kernel/kernel text=0x51a2e4
>  > readin failed
>  > 
>  > elf32_loadimage: read failed
>  > /boot/kernel/kernel text=0x51a2e4
>  > readin failed
>  > 
>  > elf32_loadimage: read failed
>  > Unable to load a kernel!
>  > -
>  > Hit [Enter] to boot immediately, or press any other key for command prompt.
>  > Booting [/boot/kernel/kernel]
>  > can't load 'kernel'
>  > Type '?' for a list of commands, 'help' for more detailed help.
>  > OK
>  > --- END PART OF OUTPUT
> 
> I assume that you don't have enough RAM.  If I remember
> correctly, your 486 machine only has 8 MB of RAM, which
> is not enough to load a GENERIC kernel nowadays.  You
> will have to compile a smaller kernel by removing all
> things that you don't need.
>
> Of course, you could also upgrade the RAM in that machine,
> if possible.
> 
>  > I'm inputting: more /boot/kernel/kernel
>  > It outputs ['?' = loads of crap]:
>  >     *** FILE /boot/kernel/kernel BEGIN ***
>  >     ?ELF?????????????????????????????????????
>  >      -- more --
> 
> Well, yes, a kernel is a binary file.  It doesn't make
> much sense to try to view it with "more".
> 
> Best regards
>    Oliver
> 

I just wanted to show that the kernel file can be read, is a loadable ELF, and 
is possibly valid. Not that i'm a comp noob :] . Imlicit question: Then why 
would the error be 'read failed'? (uh... 'readin' == preload (in RAM) ?)


More information about the freebsd-chat mailing list