what can i do with a 486?
deeptech71 at gmail.com
deeptech71 at gmail.com
Thu Apr 5 19:41:39 UTC 2007
Oliver Fromme wrote:
> deeptech71 at gmail.com wrote:
> > I've just tested dangerously dedicated mode, and it worked!
> > Next stop: it can't load the kernel (only on the 486).
> >
> > --- PART OF OUTPUT:
> > Loading /boot/defaults/loader.conf
> > /boot/kernel/kernel text=0x51a2e4
> > readin failed
> >
> > elf32_loadimage: read failed
> > /boot/kernel/kernel text=0x51a2e4
> > readin failed
> >
> > elf32_loadimage: read failed
> > Unable to load a kernel!
> > -
> > Hit [Enter] to boot immediately, or press any other key for command prompt.
> > Booting [/boot/kernel/kernel]
> > can't load 'kernel'
> > Type '?' for a list of commands, 'help' for more detailed help.
> > OK
> > --- END PART OF OUTPUT
>
> I assume that you don't have enough RAM. If I remember
> correctly, your 486 machine only has 8 MB of RAM, which
> is not enough to load a GENERIC kernel nowadays. You
> will have to compile a smaller kernel by removing all
> things that you don't need.
>
> Of course, you could also upgrade the RAM in that machine,
> if possible.
>
> > I'm inputting: more /boot/kernel/kernel
> > It outputs ['?' = loads of crap]:
> > *** FILE /boot/kernel/kernel BEGIN ***
> > ?ELF?????????????????????????????????????
> > -- more --
>
> Well, yes, a kernel is a binary file. It doesn't make
> much sense to try to view it with "more".
>
> Best regards
> Oliver
>
I just wanted to show that the kernel file can be read, is a loadable ELF, and
is possibly valid. Not that i'm a comp noob :] . Imlicit question: Then why
would the error be 'read failed'? (uh... 'readin' == preload (in RAM) ?)
More information about the freebsd-chat
mailing list