wandboard / imx6 / exynos4 / cortex-a9 "wrong-endian bug" fixed
Warner Losh
imp at bsdimp.com
Tue Feb 4 05:23:05 UTC 2014
On Feb 3, 2014, at 9:59 PM, Tim Kientzle wrote:
>
> On Feb 2, 2014, at 6:59 PM, Warner Losh <imp at bsdimp.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Feb 2, 2014, at 7:37 PM, Ian Lepore wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, 2014-02-02 at 18:25 -0700, Tom Everett wrote:
>>>> I can confirm that a crochet image for Wandboard no longer crashes after
>>>> this fix. It doesn't mount the FS yet, but that's a known issue, noted
>>>> here:
>>>>
>>>> https://github.com/kientzle/crochet-freebsd/issues/29
>>>
>>> That thread mentions needing to build a u-boot for wandboard. Here's a
>>> patchset for doing that. Apply this in your ports/sysutils dir, using:
>>>
>>> patch -p0 <u-boot-wandboard.diff
>>>
>>> This was copied from Tim's beaglebone work and changed a bit for
>>> wandboard.
>>>
>>> I've been meaning to ask about how we should handle this. Do we want a
>>> u-boot port for every board, or is there some way to parameterize a
>>> single port so that it applies the right set of patches, or what? I'm
>>> not very savvy about ports.
>>
>> Usually there's a master port, and slave ports that parameterize. When we talked about this at BSDcan, I believe that was the model that was suggested for this problem..
>
> Does that work when there’s a different source distro for
> many of the ports? (Not to mention different patches for
> each one.)
Yes, but there may be complications...
> P.S. I started a U-Boot port for BeagleBone but my
> time has evaporated. If anyone wants to take that
> over and extend it for other boards, step right up…
ENOTIME...
Warner
More information about the freebsd-arm
mailing list