wandboard / imx6 / exynos4 / cortex-a9 "wrong-endian bug" fixed
Tim Kientzle
tim at kientzle.com
Tue Feb 4 05:00:26 UTC 2014
On Feb 2, 2014, at 6:59 PM, Warner Losh <imp at bsdimp.com> wrote:
>
> On Feb 2, 2014, at 7:37 PM, Ian Lepore wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 2014-02-02 at 18:25 -0700, Tom Everett wrote:
>>> I can confirm that a crochet image for Wandboard no longer crashes after
>>> this fix. It doesn't mount the FS yet, but that's a known issue, noted
>>> here:
>>>
>>> https://github.com/kientzle/crochet-freebsd/issues/29
>>
>> That thread mentions needing to build a u-boot for wandboard. Here's a
>> patchset for doing that. Apply this in your ports/sysutils dir, using:
>>
>> patch -p0 <u-boot-wandboard.diff
>>
>> This was copied from Tim's beaglebone work and changed a bit for
>> wandboard.
>>
>> I've been meaning to ask about how we should handle this. Do we want a
>> u-boot port for every board, or is there some way to parameterize a
>> single port so that it applies the right set of patches, or what? I'm
>> not very savvy about ports.
>
> Usually there's a master port, and slave ports that parameterize. When we talked about this at BSDcan, I believe that was the model that was suggested for this problem..
Does that work when there’s a different source distro for
many of the ports? (Not to mention different patches for
each one.)
Tim
P.S. I started a U-Boot port for BeagleBone but my
time has evaporated. If anyone wants to take that
over and extend it for other boards, step right up…
More information about the freebsd-arm
mailing list