Code review request: boards on AT91

[M. Warner Losh]

In message: <835D3399-80D0-4AAA-BA85-FC922DEB6E7B at semihalf.com>
            Rafał_Jaworowski <raj at semihalf.com> writes:
: On 2008-11-25, at 22:19, M. Warner Losh wrote:
: > : > If anybody wants me to write up where I'm going with this, or  
: > answer
: > : > any question, please feel free to ask.  Also, comments would be  
: > nice.
: > :
: > : I was dreaming once about all-generic initarm() that would have  
: > KOBJ-
: > : based dispatcher, but am not sure this wouldn't cause some chicken- 
: > and-
: > : egg issues as some parts of the infrastructure might not be  
: > available
: > : at such early stages, but didn't investigate this too close, any
: > : thoughts? But anyways, even a simple scheme with common logic and
: > : function ptrs, which each platform variation would implement their  
: > own
: > : routines (or use generic), would improve the ARM init code
: > : significantly.
: >
: > Yes.  There's much duplication of code now, and I'd love to work
: > towards ways of coping with less duplication.  I'd also like to see
: > the ability to compile code either for multi-board support, or just a
: > single board support.  For the moment, I'd like to take the first step
: > and get to have the latter...
: >
: > The Marvell/Orion stuff has a much better separation, but still needs
: > some tweaks for board level support.  I think I'm going to write up
: > what I've done and put it on a wiki and then ask if you could review
: > it and see if your experience with the Marvell implementation could
: > help refine it.
: 
: Great, let me know when you got something in the wiki.

There's a fairly lame version up now:
	http://wiki.freebsd.org/FreeBSDArmBoards

We likely need a much less lame version :)

Warner