/usr/portsnap vs. /var/db/portsnap

[Hiroki Sato]

Colin Percival <cperciva at freebsd.org> wrote
  in <42F54DD4.7080901 at freebsd.org>:

cp> But for formality: Does anyone have an objection to having the base system
cp> enlarged by about 40kB by adding a program for updating the ports tree which
cp> is faster, uses less bandwidth, is more secure, and is easier to use than cvsup,
cp> while also having the side benefit of distributing pre-built INDEX files?

 Is the server-side part of portsnap available now?  I am interested in
 mirroring since portsnap.daemonology.net is too far from my box in Japan.

-- 
| Hiroki SATO
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch/attachments/20050807/cc3c7d65/attachment.bin