dev_t / udev_t confusion ?

[Garance A Drosihn]

At 8:43 AM -0400 6/9/04, Brian Feldman wrote:
>On Wed, Jun 09, 2004, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>  > [...]
>>  The change proposed is more or less to do:
>>	s/dev_t/struct cdev */
>>	s/udev_t/dev_t/
>>  over all the kernel sources (366 files or so).
>>  [....]
>
>One yes vote, please.  The dev_t structure is not treated as
>opaque, so as long as people are going to->dereference it, it
>deserves to be a struct *.

This sounds like the right path to me.

-- 
Garance Alistair Drosehn            =   gad at gilead.netel.rpi.edu
Senior Systems Programmer           or  gad at freebsd.org
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute    or  drosih at rpi.edu