dev_t / udev_t confusion ?

[Maxime Henrion]

Brian Feldman wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 09, 2004 at 01:16:30PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> > [...]
> > The change proposed is more or less to do:
> > 	s/dev_t/struct cdev */
> > 	s/udev_t/dev_t/
> > over all the kernel sources (366 files or so).
> > [....]
> 
> One yes vote, please.  The dev_t structure is not treated as opaque,
> so as long as people are going to->dereference it, it deserves to be
> a struct *.

This reflects what I think perfectly.

Cheers,
Maxime