cvs commit: src/contrib/cvs/src server.c

[Jacques A. Vidrine]

On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 02:13:44PM -0500, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
> I have no objection to the change, but it does seem to me that
> *any* change to a "security" branch deserves to be mentioned
> in UPDATING.  I do not agree that we should ignore that policy
> simply because this is a "5.x-release" branch.

RELENG_5_2 is not really a security branch yet, as it is still in the
release engineer's hands.

If this CVS change needs an UPDATING entry, then every merge we've
done needs an UPDATING entry.  I'll leave that up to RE.  (RE has
already documented the changes in the release notes.)

Cheers,
-- 
Jacques Vidrine   NTT/Verio SME      FreeBSD UNIX       Heimdal
nectar at celabo.org jvidrine at verio.net nectar at freebsd.org nectar at kth.se