cvs commit: ports/net/csup Makefile distinfo

[Florent Thoumie]

On Thu, 2006-06-22 at 13:21 +0200, Maxime Henrion wrote:
> Florent Thoumie wrote:
> > On Thu, 2006-06-22 at 13:17 +0300, Vasil Dimov wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 05:11:16PM +0000, Marcus Alves Grando wrote:
> > > > mnag        2006-06-21 17:11:16 UTC
> > > > 
> > > >   FreeBSD ports repository
> > > > 
> > > >   Modified files:
> > > >     net/csup             Makefile distinfo 
> > > >   Log:
> > > >   - Update to 20060318
> > > >   - Fix build in tinderbox using ${OSVERSION} instead .if exists()
> > > >   
> > > >   Approved by:    mux
> > > >   
> > > 
> > > % portupgrade /var/db/pkg/csup-20060313_1/
> > > ** Port marked as IGNORE: net/csup:
> > >         is already in the base system
> > > % which csup
> > > /usr/local/bin/csup
> > > % ls -l /usr/bin/csup
> > > ls: /usr/bin/csup: No such file or directory
> > > % sysctl kern.osreldate
> > > kern.osreldate: 601100
> > > %
> 
> Looks like mnag@ picked up a wrong osreldate number.  I don't have the
> time to fix it myself but anyone wanting to take care of it has my
> approval.
> 
> > It's a bit unrelated but why one wouldn't want to have both csup from
> > base and ports? I don't want to upgrade my system just to have a recent
> > csup.
> 
> I don't expect to see many new versions of csup in the future, so it
> doesn't make much sense to have both the csup port and the version from
> the base.

I was under the impression that csup was moving fast lately. If you're
not planning a lot of new releases it's not that useful indeed.

-- 
Florent Thoumie
flz at FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD Committer
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-ports/attachments/20060622/7c0b5a89/attachment.pgp