cvs commit: ports/net/csup Makefile distinfo

[Maxime Henrion]

Florent Thoumie wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-06-22 at 13:21 +0200, Maxime Henrion wrote:
> > Florent Thoumie wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2006-06-22 at 13:17 +0300, Vasil Dimov wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 05:11:16PM +0000, Marcus Alves Grando wrote:
> > > > > mnag        2006-06-21 17:11:16 UTC
> > > > > 
> > > > >   FreeBSD ports repository
> > > > > 
> > > > >   Modified files:
> > > > >     net/csup             Makefile distinfo 
> > > > >   Log:
> > > > >   - Update to 20060318
> > > > >   - Fix build in tinderbox using ${OSVERSION} instead .if exists()
> > > > >   
> > > > >   Approved by:    mux
> > > > >   
> > > > 
> > > > % portupgrade /var/db/pkg/csup-20060313_1/
> > > > ** Port marked as IGNORE: net/csup:
> > > >         is already in the base system
> > > > % which csup
> > > > /usr/local/bin/csup
> > > > % ls -l /usr/bin/csup
> > > > ls: /usr/bin/csup: No such file or directory
> > > > % sysctl kern.osreldate
> > > > kern.osreldate: 601100
> > > > %
> > 
> > Looks like mnag@ picked up a wrong osreldate number.  I don't have the
> > time to fix it myself but anyone wanting to take care of it has my
> > approval.
> > 
> > > It's a bit unrelated but why one wouldn't want to have both csup from
> > > base and ports? I don't want to upgrade my system just to have a recent
> > > csup.
> > 
> > I don't expect to see many new versions of csup in the future, so it
> > doesn't make much sense to have both the csup port and the version from
> > the base.
> 
> I was under the impression that csup was moving fast lately. If you're
> not planning a lot of new releases it's not that useful indeed.

As a datapoint, the last csup release was 20060318 so it was a few
months ago already.  I plan to do a new relase "some time soon" for one
minor change or too.  After that, I don't even know if there'll be
another release, unless the people that have said they are interested in
getting CVS mode support actually do it.

Cheers,
Maxime