cvs commit: ports/net/haproxy Makefile distinfo

[Baptiste Daroussin]

On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 12:41:35PM -0700, Jason Helfman wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 10:20:28AM -0700, Eitan Adler thus spake:
> >On 21 May 2012 00:09, Marcelo Araujo <araujobsdport at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Just to let more clear the reason there is no maintainer approval.
> >> However, if there is some security thing related with the update, I believe
> >> isn't necessary the maintainer approval.
> >
> >portmgr or secteam still needs to approve.
> >
> >
> Not only was this a bugfix, but it also covered a CVE. Is that still
> required for a timeout?
> 
> http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/05/23/15
> 
> I also added this to a note on this pr:
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/165035
> 
> That being said, is there going to be a vuxml write-up for this commit?
> 
> -jgh
> 
> -- 
> Jason Helfman
> FreeBSD Committer | http://people.freebsd.org/~jgh | The Power To Serve

If there a security fix just go ahead and commit along with a vuxml entry.

regards,
Bapt
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 196 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all/attachments/20120524/e5721b6a/attachment.pgp