cvs commit: ports/net/haproxy Makefile distinfo

[Jason Helfman]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 10:20:28AM -0700, Eitan Adler thus spake:
>On 21 May 2012 00:09, Marcelo Araujo <araujobsdport at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Just to let more clear the reason there is no maintainer approval.
>> However, if there is some security thing related with the update, I believe
>> isn't necessary the maintainer approval.
>
>portmgr or secteam still needs to approve.
>
>
Not only was this a bugfix, but it also covered a CVE. Is that still
required for a timeout?

http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/05/23/15

I also added this to a note on this pr:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/165035

That being said, is there going to be a vuxml write-up for this commit?

- -jgh

- -- 
Jason Helfman
FreeBSD Committer | http://people.freebsd.org/~jgh | The Power To Serve
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPvo7vAAoJECBZmmNBUNPcggkH/jM2VMM9o1wMFb1qCrlUMMP7
EdHU8F1XqmIXmf3bcq/Fwl5fHJmofiGCgZ0J2QnSOlocvozEtXJgKxof8uck1iHP
eQ6EjAhnUiX/FPWum2PrAnUcNyu11emBhIpITD2BMrVBVs09w4jIHjutu+Oqsoot
WKEQJ5AOhOkLZIY+08k4LDRMAC6+tKhiwm2+Geef0eHq+AjfUvqqUOhWcx/g3x9i
EFC/EI28szfq68IHpjl4FBcE1pNkoUr4v6NNoNcaYGQ3Qrh3VLyS6oebtMohPF6X
ifI4eZYEZbzCbT6ls6WDM2+OPeBoi6Imhqr1F7xvrk3HrFUVD5ZFZOSSHpG0pQI=
=0YRI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----