cvs commit: ports/www/websh Makefile

[Andrej Zverev]

On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 7:54 PM, Erwin Lansing <erwin at freebsd.org> wrote:

> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 11:08:52AM -0500, Greg Larkin wrote:
> > On 2/22/11 10:48 AM, Mark Linimon wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 08:18:14AM -0500, Greg Larkin wrote:
> > >> Is it a good idea to decrement PORTREVISION after the previous commit
> > >> has been in the tree for some number of hours?
> > >
> > > Nope.  For instance, if a pointyhat run _had_ been started during that
> > > window, the uploaded package would now be wrong.
> > >
> > > mcl
> >
> > What's the proper fix at this point - rebump to current PORTREVISION+2,
> > or is a PORTEPOCH bump required?
> >
> Just reinstating it to PORTREVISON+1 should be good enough.  There's no
> need to get the, few, people that may have upgraded during the time to
> upgrade again to +2.  PKGVERSION needs to be the same or higher, it just
> cannot go down.
>
> -erwin
>

How about to fix it? :-)

>
> --
> Erwin Lansing                                   http://droso.org
> Prediction is very difficult
> especially about the future                    erwin at FreeBSD.org
>