cvs commit: ports/www/websh Makefile

Erwin Lansing erwin at FreeBSD.org
Tue Feb 22 16:54:56 UTC 2011


On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 11:08:52AM -0500, Greg Larkin wrote:
> On 2/22/11 10:48 AM, Mark Linimon wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 08:18:14AM -0500, Greg Larkin wrote:
> >> Is it a good idea to decrement PORTREVISION after the previous commit
> >> has been in the tree for some number of hours?
> > 
> > Nope.  For instance, if a pointyhat run _had_ been started during that
> > window, the uploaded package would now be wrong.
> > 
> > mcl
> 
> What's the proper fix at this point - rebump to current PORTREVISION+2,
> or is a PORTEPOCH bump required?
> 
Just reinstating it to PORTREVISON+1 should be good enough.  There's no
need to get the, few, people that may have upgraded during the time to
upgrade again to +2.  PKGVERSION needs to be the same or higher, it just
cannot go down.

-erwin

-- 
Erwin Lansing                                   http://droso.org
Prediction is very difficult
especially about the future                    erwin at FreeBSD.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 188 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all/attachments/20110222/cf5ada49/attachment.pgp


More information about the cvs-all mailing list