Move ctm to ports?

[Stephen Montgomery-Smith]

On 12/05/11 08:26, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> Hi,
> Roman Kurakin wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
>>> How would people feel about removing ctm and mkctm from the base
>>> system, and making it into a port?

OK, I am persuaded - no moving CTM to ports.  I'll see if I can get a 
src commit bit, with the promise that I will only touch the ctm stuff.

Next - suppose I want to make svn-cur officially part of CTM.  Do any of 
you see a problem with having something in the base depending upon 
something in the ports - namely subversion and xz?  (And hopefully in 
the next few years, subversion will become part of base.)