Move ctm to ports?
rik at inse.ru
Mon Dec 5 15:08:23 UTC 2011
Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
> On 12/05/11 08:26, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
>> Roman Kurakin wrote:
>>> Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
>>>> How would people feel about removing ctm and mkctm from the base
>>>> system, and making it into a port?
> OK, I am persuaded - no moving CTM to ports. I'll see if I can get a
> src commit bit, with the promise that I will only touch the ctm stuff.
> Next - suppose I want to make svn-cur officially part of CTM. Do any
> of you see a problem with having something in the base depending upon
> something in the ports - namely subversion and xz? (And hopefully in
> the next few years, subversion will become part of base.)
It is not a good idea. How do you see the way to compile the base
without smth in base?
There is no problem with smth that uses smth ports-based, but not depend
on smth ports-based.
What do you think about plugins?
More information about the ctm-users