Move ctm to ports?

[Roman Kurakin]

Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
> On 12/05/11 08:26, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
>> Hi,
>> Roman Kurakin wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
>>>> How would people feel about removing ctm and mkctm from the base
>>>> system, and making it into a port?
>
> OK, I am persuaded - no moving CTM to ports.  I'll see if I can get a 
> src commit bit, with the promise that I will only touch the ctm stuff.
>
> Next - suppose I want to make svn-cur officially part of CTM.  Do any 
> of you see a problem with having something in the base depending upon 
> something in the ports - namely subversion and xz?  (And hopefully in 
> the next few years, subversion will become part of base.)
It is not a good idea. How do you see the way to compile the base 
without smth in base?
There is no problem with smth that uses smth ports-based, but not depend 
on smth ports-based.
What do you think about plugins?

rik
>
>