AHA2790UW has speed-limit problems ?

[Justin T. Gibbs]

>
>It's exactly this kind of discussion that has encouraged me to think
>that Fibre Channel is a better technology when you're getting to these
>speeds. The cost differential between this and parallel SCSI is getting
>to be pretty small.

I wish IBM hadn't botched the marketing of SSA.  It's so much nicer than
Fiber Channel.  The concern we have here at Pluto about Fiber Channel is
the power cost.  We couldn't put 20 fiber channel drives into our system
without bumping up to much more expensive, larger capacity, power supplies.
There is also the fault tolerance issue and expense.  We're single target/
single initiator so we can "play to air" even if a drive hangs on the wire.
 With SE/LVD SCSI, we can do this for ~$20 per SCSI HA chip.  SSA would
have solved this problem with it's dual port nature without forcing us to a
single controller per drive configuration, but with fiber channel, you have
no choice.  I can't imagine being able to build a cost effective single
initiator/single target system with fiber channel.  The tranceiver cost
alone would kill us.

--
Justin



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo at FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe aic7xxx" in the body of the message