netgraph only on i386/ia64 - why ?

[Julian Elischer]

I made the commit but we can still change param.h if people really want it..


Julian Elischer wrote:

>
>
> John Polstra wrote:
>
>> I dropped scottl and re from the cc list, since they're busy and asked
>> us to work it out on our own.
>>
>> On 20-Aug-2004 Julian Elischer wrote:
>>  
>>
>>> Ok so what is the next number that should be used?
>>> it's currently  #define __FreeBSD_version 600000
>>>
>>> 600001?
>>>   
>>
>>
>> Yes, that would be the next number.  I question whether
>> __FreeBSD_version needs to be bumped at all, though, since the
>> change is already reflected in NG_VERSION and NG_ABI_VERSION.  Any
>> port that uses netgraph would be compiled against the header files
>> on the system, so I can't see how it would be useful to change
>> __FreeBSD_version for this.  (Not that I feel very strongly about it.)
>>
>
> I sort of agree..
> We protect ourselves.. we needn't bump the FreeBSD version I don't 
> think..
> If you have a good reason for it I'll do it but I don't think it is 
> required.. No port will be compiled
> with different options because of this..
> I mean  5.3 and 6.0 will already have a netgraph recompile required..
>
>>
>>  
>>
>>> here's a cut-n-paste version.. for comment..
>>> it's ready to commit.
>>>   
>>
>>
>> Thanks for taking this on.  I haven't tested it, but it looks good.
>> Just one nit: "align" is misspelled as "allign" in the UPDATING entry.
>>
>> John
>> _______________________________________________
>> freebsd-net at freebsd.org mailing list
>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>>  
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-net at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"