svn commit: r265187 - in user/dchagin/lemul/sys: amd64/linux amd64/linux32 compat/linux i386/linux

[Chagin Dmitry]

On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 09:20:16AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Friday, May 02, 2014 12:41:19 am Chagin Dmitry wrote:
> > On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 04:13:09PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
> > > 
> > > On May 1, 2014, at 10:26 AM, Chagin Dmitry <dchagin at freebsd.org> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 09:17:45AM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
> > > >> Re this and the signals changes: Are you sure that these values are 
> identical on all linux ABIs? Last time I checked, there was substantial 
> variation between arm, x86 and mips for these values.
> > > >> 
> > > > 
> > > > They are all different. I know. We emulate only x86, not arm or mips. So 
> what the reason to case about this platform?
> > > 
> > > The structure of the code is such that the other platforms can be added 
> later. These changes make that harder than necessary when you could have move 
> them to sys/x86 instead of making them fully MI.
> > > 
> > > Anyway, just my humble feedback. I suspect we'll get demand to support 
> linux/arm64 binaries about this time next year based on the trajectories of 
> the arm64 roll out...
> > > 
> > 
> > yes, I ponder about something like sys/compat/linux/x86linux.h, thanks.
> 
> I think I would prefer sys/x86/linux to mirror sys/amd64/linux32 and 
> sys/i386/linux.  You could put headers and/or .c files in that directory.
> 

really, thanks!

-- 
Have fun!
chd
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-src-user/attachments/20140503/fc2e139d/attachment.sig>