svn commit: r214984 - stable/8/lib/libproc

[Rui Paulo]

On Nov 8, 2010, at 3:19 PM, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:

> Hi,
> 
>>>>>> On Mon, 8 Nov 2010 15:06:12 +0000
>>>>>> Rui Paulo <rpaulo at FreeBSD.org> said:
> 
> rpaulo> It's on my plans, but basename_r is not POSIX and there was a private discussion about it a couple of weeks ago. The conclusion is that we should adopt the Android semantics of basename_r().
> 
> I found the thread, and understood it.  However, I still wonderling if
> breaking thread-safeness in proc_sym.c is okay, though it may not be
> necessary.

We can live with it for now while I work on a new basename_r().

Regards,
--
Rui Paulo