svn commit: r208766 - stable/8/sys/netinet

Robert N. M. Watson rwatson at
Sat Jun 5 13:30:33 UTC 2010

On 4 Jun 2010, at 20:33, Ermal Luçi wrote:

> Interface event are not an issue for pfSense architecture since it
> controls all the underlying data and i think most of the divert
> applications do not care much about interface events apart renaming.
> Keeping both options sounds reasonable too.

A patch along these lines would, I think, be most welcome. There is, of course, the issue of a short window before the socket option is set -- possibly there's a good way to distinguish this via the sockaddr?


More information about the svn-src-stable-8 mailing list