svn commit: r192590 - stable/7/sys/sys
kostikbel at gmail.com
Fri May 22 20:33:55 UTC 2009
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 04:21:14PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Friday 22 May 2009 4:08:31 pm Dimitry Andric wrote:
> > On 2009-05-22 21:07, John Baldwin wrote:
> > >> Log:
> > >> some ports erroneously use the existence of AT_FDCWD to check for
> > >> the availability of the *at system calls so s/AT_FDCWD/AT_FDCWD_notyet/g
> > >>
> > >> Reported by: Dimitry Andric
> > >
> > > I wonder if it wouldn't be appropriate to just remove the dirfd bits entirely
> > > from 7.x for now. I.e. remove NDINIT_AT(), AT_FDCWD_notyet, the 'dirfd'
> > > member from the structure, the 'dirfd' parameter from NDINIT_ALL(), etc. ZFS
> > > only really needed NDINIT_ATVP(), yes?
> > Are there any plans to MFC the *at() calls? (I'd guess not, since it
> > looks like they change the ABI...)
> I don't think there are due to the ABI change, and if they were ever MFC'd,
> the NDINIT, etc. bits could be restored as part of that merge.
No, the MFC is posponed not due to KBI change. As I said, I already have
a permission from re@ to change nameidata.
Robert (Cc:ed) hold the MFC because the new fd argument of the at syscalls
is not audited.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-src-stable-7/attachments/20090522/f153b00d/attachment.pgp
More information about the svn-src-stable-7