svn commit: r191381 - head/crypto/openssl/crypto/asn1 releng/6.3 releng/6.3/crypto/openssl/crypto/asn1 releng/6.3/lib/libc/db/btree releng/6.3/lib/libc/db/hash releng/6.3/lib/libc/db/mpool releng/6...

[Simon L. Nielsen]

On 2009.04.25 05:24:45 +0200, Max Laier wrote:
> On Saturday 25 April 2009 00:18:19 Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
> > I feel like it would better use svn to commit to head, stable/7, releng/7,
> > stable/6, etc... seperately.
> >
> > I tried to diff -rPREV or grab a patch and it didn't help much cause it had
> > all the different versions in it.
> >
> > Thoughts, RTFM ?
> 
> svn diff -c 191381 svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/{head,stable/{6,7}}
> 
> works like a charm.

Also, the base patches for releases are linked as files from the
advisories.

Doing one big commit does save some time and reduce risk for user
errors when releasing an advisory, so there would have to be a good
argument not to do it.

-- 
Simon L. Nielsen