svn commit: r367280 - head/lib/libc/gen

Konstantin Belousov kostikbel at gmail.com
Mon Nov 2 22:32:25 UTC 2020


On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 11:22:15PM +0100, Emmanuel Vadot wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Nov 2020 00:10:39 +0200
> Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 10:49:07PM +0100, Emmanuel Vadot wrote:
> > >  I think that the first question we want to ask is : Do we want to
> > > support LOCALBASE being different than /usr/local
> > >  I honestly don't see any advantages of making it !=/usr/local/ and
> > > before we start putting a lot of new/useless(for I guess 99% of our
> > > user base) in the tree we should here why people are using /usr/pkg or
> > > whatever weird location.
> > >  If they have some good argument, then we should proceed further.
> > 
> > I would be delighted to be able to install _and use_ two independent
> > set of packages from the same base system install.  Without recursing
> > to jails, X forwarding, etc.
> > 
> > In fact I would like to use /usr/local and e.g /usr/local-i386 on amd64
> > machine.  I am fine with me building both of them in my instance of
> > poudriere.
> > 
> > But indeed I am not sure if this worth the effort of many people, for many
> > hours.  If it puts too high burden on everybody, then it is not a good
> > feature.  Otherwise, it is very convenient in some situations.
> 
>  I understand this situation but I think that the best way for you do
> do that is to use pkg install -r /path/to/my/i386/packages
> 
>  Since you will need to tweak you PATH variable to start applications
> installed in /usr/local-i386 anyway it's not too much to tweak that to
> the pkg path for your i386 repo.
> 
>  The "downside" of using this method is that you will have
> a /usr/local/ under the /path/to/my/i386/packages.
>  The "upside" of using this method is that you would be able to use the
> same i386 packages on a native i386 install and they would install
> in /usr/local/ (so no tweaking here).
If I can already use them from non-/usr/local prefix, then it is great
news (for me).  But I have a reason to doubt.

For instance, a lot of applications are configured at build time to look
for /usr/local.  Like, gcc with /usr/local/lib/gcc/<version>, and binutils,
which are actually one of the main use case for me.  So I believe that
pkg install -r requires chroot/jail for the result to work.


More information about the svn-src-head mailing list