svn commit: r358411 - head/contrib/sendmail/src

[Eugene Grosbein]

03.03.2020 4:13, Jung-uk Kim wrote:

> On 20. 3. 2., Eugene Grosbein wrote:
>> 02.03.2020 21:29, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
>>
>>>>> You can easily repeat the problem using recent ports tree and
>>>>> recent stable/11 and handbook-recommended way.
>>>>
>>>> Mixing base and ports OpenSSLs is a bad idea.  If you decided to
>>>> build some ports with ports OpenSSL for some reason, every ports
>>>> using OpenSSL should be rebuilt with it to avoid this mayhem.
>>>
>>> And vice versa, i.e., every port using OpenSSL should be rebuilt if
>>> you decided to go back to base OpenSSL.
>>
>> One more time: these days it is not possible. There are ports that need new 1.1.1 API
>> and cannot be used with stable/11 using base SSL, there is no choice.
>> That's why base sendmail needs to use new SSL API too.
> 
> I don't understand why you insist on patching Sendmail to use new SSL
> API.  Are you trying to build base Sendmail with ports OpenSSL?  AFAIK,
> there is no way to do that.

I merely try to understand how to unbreak upgrade path for 11.2-STABLE workstations
with stock sendmail and SSL support that also has many ports installed including
ports requiring new openssl API. Because buildworld fails and upgrade is broken.