svn commit: r354458 - head/libexec/rc/rc.d

[Edward Tomasz Napierała]

On 1111T2115, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> Quoting Edward Tomasz Napierała <trasz at freebsd.org> (from Sun, 10 Nov  
> 2019 20:25:04 +0000):
> 
> > On 1110T1147, Conrad Meyer wrote:
> 
> >> I am on board with making this stuff more “batteries included” and usable
> >> by default, but just echoing the request for configurable knobs (I don’t
> >> care about the defaults).
> >
> > My point is... well, there are two.  First is, it's configurable already:
> > you can comment out parts of the rc script you don't want, or you can not
> 
> We want to have the system rc scripts "no touch" scripts, don't we?

I don't quite agree, but I'm not going to fight for it.

> > set linux_enable in the first place and do things it would otherwise do
> > for you by in the usual manner - add the modules to loader.conf, add a
> > line to sysctl.conf etc.  The script simply provides a shortcut to match
> > what 90% of users want.
> 
> I agree.
> 
> > Second, in order to implement something properly, I need to understand
> > how it's going to be used.  I guess I worded it quite badly in the
> > previous mail; it's wasn't supposed to sound like "Can you give me some
> > use case because I think you're wrong", but rather a "Can you give me
> > some use case, because without it I have no idea how to design it to
> > fit it".
> 
> What about a config variable which enables or disables the mounts?  
> That way we don't have to modify the rc script to get back to the old  
> behavior in cases were we need it.

Okay, this is easy to do; see https://reviews.freebsd.org/D22320.