svn commit: r354458 - head/libexec/rc/rc.d

Edward Tomasz Napierala trasz at freebsd.org
Sun Nov 10 16:08:26 UTC 2019


On 1109T2049, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> Quoting Edward Tomasz Napierala <trasz at freebsd.org> (from Thu, 7 Nov  
> 2019 18:15:24 +0000 (UTC)):
> 
> > Author: trasz
> > Date: Thu Nov  7 18:15:24 2019
> > New Revision: 354458
> > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/354458
> >
> > Log:
> >   Extend the linux rc script to mount the neccessary file systems,
> >   set ELF fallback brand, and load pty(4).
> 
> We never did something like that. We have it documented everywhere  
> that it needs to be done manually. So this is at least a POLA  
> violation. It is great that the nocover option is used in the mount,  
> but it's still some kind of layering violation (I may want to have  
> only a subset mounted, or nothing at all).

It is kind of a POLA violation, but previously the linux_enable
knob didn't do much apart from loading the linux{,64}.ko kernel
module and doing something weird with ldconfig, which I'm not
even sure is actually useful.  In other words, the old behaviour
can be restored by just not using linux_enable, and instead
loading the kernel modules the same way all the others are loaded.

Could you give me some use case why someone would want only a subset
of the filesystems?

> I do not object to the functionality, but I think it needs to be  
> configurable (an option to influence if the auto-mount is done or not,  
> doesn't matter to me what the default behavior is, as long as it is  
> configurable) and documented (UPDATING, handbook, man-pages, maybe  
> even the release notes).

Man page updates are pending review at https://reviews.freebsd.org/D22277.
Good point about the Handbook and release notes; I'll take a look.



More information about the svn-src-head mailing list