svn commit: r348303 - head/sys/net

[Gleb Smirnoff]

On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 08:56:23PM +0300, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
A> On 29.05.2019 06:12, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
A> > A> bpf_mtap() is not the only consumer of bd_bif, some of them expect it
A> > A> becomes NULL when descriptor is detached.
A> > 
A> > May be then make a flag attached/detached?
A> 
A> Do you have benchmark results that show some benefits in performance? :)
A> I prefer to wait some time after MFC to get a bit wide testing, before
A> doing another performance optimizations.

I was mostly motivated not by performance but by design, so that it conforms
to delayed free architecture.

Btw, now I see that my one liner isn't sufficient, since we bpfif_rele() not in
the deferred context but right after CK_LIST_REMOVE().

-- 
Gleb Smirnoff