svn commit: r347410 - in head: . sys/amd64/conf sys/arm/conf sys/arm64/conf sys/i386/conf sys/powerpc/conf sys/riscv/conf sys/sparc64/conf

[Andrey V. Elsukov]

On 10.05.2019 21:39, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
>> The second cause -- reduce overhead that IPSEC produces even when it
>> is not used.
> 
> So does it mean that if I don't plan to use IPSEC, I can safely remove
> IPSEC_SUPPORT from my config and also get slight performance boost?

Yes, currently each call to IPsec has check like
`if (ipsec_enabled) {...}`, when you build the kernel without
IPSEC/IPSEC_SUPPORT, this check will be removed too, this can add some
performance boost :-)

-- 
WBR, Andrey V. Elsukov

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 554 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-src-head/attachments/20190510/a3099271/attachment.sig>