svn commit: r335402 - head/sbin/veriexecctl
Mark Linimon
linimon at lonesome.com
Thu Jun 21 19:03:00 UTC 2018
On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 12:33:26PM -0600, Ian Lepore wrote:
> Hiding work in patchsets and reviews and alternate branches and other
> shadowy places because it's not perfect
I do not consider bugzilla and phabricator to be "shadowy places";
therefore, I reject this argument.
Although I don't have statistics, AFAICT phabricator patches have a
better-than-even chance of going in.
But, in any case, a middle position would have been to commit this to
a vendor branch and publish instructions on how to grab it from there
and enable it.
I understand that -current will have regressions in it. However, the
pendulum has recently swung in the direction of "free-for-all". This
slows down (e.g.) my own work on -currernt such as testing arm boards
and trying to fix ports there. ATM I'm not even *attempting* to do the
latter because I have little faith that any -current I bring in past
the one I'm locked down to (r333619 May 16 UTC 2018) will do anything
but burn my time trying to track down regressions.
tl:dr; I have enough work to do without trying to fix other people's
stuff. If that's harsh, so be it.
mcl
More information about the svn-src-head
mailing list