svn commit: r335402 - head/sbin/veriexecctl

[Cy Schubert]

In message <96021.1529475664 at kaos.jnpr.net>, "Simon J. Gerraty" writes:
> Conrad Meyer <cem at freebsd.org> wrote:
> > First and foremost: nothing is actually signed, anywhere.  The
>
> The signing of manifests is external.  The veriexecctl tool is I assume
> a straight copy of what's in NetBSD (I've not looked at it in at least a
> decade).

If this is correct, should it not be imported into the vendor branches 
first?

What are the criteria to import through the vendor branches v.s. direct 
import into HEAD? Do I fail to understand a missing piece of 
information or is there an inconsistency?


-- 
Cheers,
Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert at cschubert.com>
FreeBSD UNIX:  <cy at FreeBSD.org>   Web:  http://www.FreeBSD.org

	The need of the many outweighs the greed of the few.