svn commit: r334804 - in head/sys: kern modules/tcp modules/tcp/rack netinet netinet/tcp_stacks sys

[Matthew Macy]

>
> Okay. I believe there might be situations where we may want to still
> keep the 'default' stack alive. I know Windows doesn't yet use RACK when
> rtt is lesser than 10ms (or something like that), as an example.
>


Is there any reason RACK wouldn't work for tracking 10us RTTs? If we
know we know the peer doesn't do delack or have enough data in flight
and the other stack doesn't have broken LRO, could we just use this in
lieu of high resolution timestamps?

-M