svn commit: r338053 - head/sys/netinet

[Michael Tuexen]

> On 20. Aug 2018, at 09:33, Bjoern A. Zeeb <bzeeb-lists at lists.zabbadoz.net> wrote:
> 
> On 20 Aug 2018, at 1:13, Conrad Meyer wrote:
> 
>> On Sun, Aug 19, 2018 at 11:40 AM, Bjoern A. Zeeb
>> <bzeeb-lists at lists.zabbadoz.net> wrote:
>>> I am so happy we have a version control system where you could hopefully
>>> find out if the original committer left a decent commit message.. takes less
>>> than 60 seconds ..
>>> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=82122
>> 
>> It is great we have such a system, but unfortunately the message
>> doesn't really answer my question(s).  I don't know that that means it
>> isn't "decent," but it isn't really helpful.  :-)
> 
> Well it tells you all you need to know.
> If you open the RFC cited it’ll tell you why the 4-tuple is used and why MD5, which seemed to be the questions you two were guessing about.
At the time the RFC was written, the choice was good.

The question I have is if we should change the function to SIP-HASH...

Best regards
Michael
> 
> /bz
> 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5367 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-src-head/attachments/20180820/d326db68/attachment.bin>