svn commit: r318750 - in head/contrib: binutils/bfd binutils/ld binutils/ld/emulparams gcc gcc/config/s390

[Pedro Giffuni]

Hi;

On 06/01/17 19:51, Bryan Drewery wrote:
...
<snip>
>> Building /usr/obj/root/svn/base/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/libbfd/targmatch.h
>> Skipping meta for .depend: no commands
>> Skipping meta for afterdepend: .PHONY
>> Skipping meta for depend: .PHONY
>> Skipping meta for objwarn: .PHONY
>> Skipping meta for beforebuild: .PHONY
>> Skipping meta for .WAIT_1: .PHONY
>> /usr/obj/root/svn/base/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/libbfd/targets.o.meta: 81: file '/usr/obj/root/svn/base/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/libbfd/./targmatch.h' is newer than the target...
>> Building /usr/obj/root/svn/base/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/libbfd/targets.o
> targets.o is the only relevant object file I could find in the broken
> objtree given to me that was post-ino64.  It doesn't directly use any of
> the changes structs that I can see, but the mixed-ABI proof is enough
> for me to put the understanding of this to rest.
>
> In case I wasn't clear, this commit is perfectly fine.  It just
> triggered a META_MODE bug.
>
Thanks for the research.

Adding new platform support in a toolchain that is dying is indeed an 
unusual change. I won't do it again ;).

Pedro.