svn commit: r296387 - head

[Jonathan Looney]

On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 12:49 AM, Warner Losh <imp at bsdimp.com> wrote:
> It's trivial so worth having.  We should discuss what our "oldest
> supported upgrade" release should be as currently it is 8.1.
> 
> We put it to 8.1 based on Juniper wanted it for their operations.
> Normally we'd set this closer to 9.0 or something. If Juniper
> no longer needs it, we should move up to 9.0 since that's typically
> what we've done in the past at this point in the release cycle.

I don't think Juniper cares about this anymore. Even if we do, I'm not
sure why 8.1 would be the release we would choose (at least, at this
point).

Jonathan