svn commit: r303716 - head/crypto/openssh

[Andrey Chernov]

On 08.08.2016 1:48, Xin Li wrote:
> Well, despite the fact that I have to admit that I get locked out from
> my own storage box too, however (even without wearing any hat) I am for
> the change and would blame myself for being lazy in adopting the change
> when the upstream have announced it earlier about a year ago.
> 
> Compatibility with legacy software/hardware, sure, but if we don't stop
> at some point, it would be like SSL 2.0 which people have pointed out
> several flaws in 1995 and take 16 years to get deprecated and still bite
> people in 2014.
> 
> We should do something like what OpenSSH have done by creating a page
> describing the motivation, the impact, the temporary but discouraged
> workaround, etc., and mention it in the release notes to prevent people
> from being bite.

I agree. I am not seeking hardly, stopping after first solution, but at
least one workaround found: using security/putty port. It still supports
all obsoleted stuff. One disadvantage: in terminal mode it requires X11.



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 455 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-src-head/attachments/20160808/dd027b11/attachment.sig>