svn commit: r289664 - head/sys/kern

[Anton Yuzhaninov]

On 10/20/15 23:42, Bryan Drewery wrote:
> On 10/20/2015 1:38 PM, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
>> Author: kib
>> Date: Tue Oct 20 20:38:20 2015
>> New Revision: 289664
>> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/289664
>>
>> Log:
>>    Trim spaces at end of line to record the proper commit message for
>>    r289660:
>
> I really think we should just do a full revert and recommit in these
> cases, and not even a forced commit.  Neither this commit or a forced
> commit will show in 'svn blame' or even during a bisect.  It really just
> becomes luck to find the right commit noting the message.  IMHO 'svn
> blame' is more important than some extra churn in 'svn log' or email. It
> does add more steps in 'svn blame' but it ends up giving the right
> message more obviously.
>
> I'm not asking to redo this commit now, but I think we should have a
> standard of just recommitting to fix mistakes.

Why
svn propedit svn:log --revprop -r289660
Is not used?
AFAIR this was disabled, because revprop edit can't be synced with CVS. But 
there is no official CVS repo for a log time.