svn commit: r282985 - in head/sys: arm/annapurna arm/annapurna/alpine arm/annapurna/alpine/hal arm/conf boot/fdt/dts/arm

[Mathieu Arnold]

+--On 18 mai 2015 10:52:29 -0400 Ed Maste <emaste at freebsd.org> wrote:
| On 18 May 2015 at 10:11, Mathieu Arnold <m at absolight.fr> wrote:
|> 
|> Mmmm, if this can be done only for base, and not for ports, sure, but
|> ports need to be able to add patches with CRLF endings, because upstream
|> software comes in all flavors, including CRLF files we need to be able
|> to patch.
| 
| Sure it could, we could configure it however we want.
| 
| Note that we'll likely need to support CRLF in base anyway - one
| obvious example is test cases for CRLF handling in various tools.  I'd
| imagine we could add an SVN keyword like fbsd:crlf=yes, along the
| lines of fbsd:nokeywords=yes.
| 
| Do you know how common CRLF or partial CRLF files are in the ports
| tree?  If it's only a handful that scheme could work there too.

$ ag -l '\r' /usr/ports/|wc -l
      95

there's a bit more than a handful, but it could work, yes.  If you want to
have a look at a typical one, /usr/ports/shells/ibsh/files/patch-Makefile
:-)

But I think Eitan was talking about Phabricator, in this case, it'd need to
work there too.

-- 
Mathieu Arnold