svn commit: r278249 - head/etc/rc.d

[NGie Cooper]

On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 1:39 PM, John Baldwin <jhb at freebsd.org> wrote:
> On Thursday, February 05, 2015 12:51:41 PM Garrett Cooper wrote:
>> On Feb 5, 2015, at 5:04, John Baldwin <jhb at freebsd.org> wrote:
>> > On Thursday, February 05, 2015 11:38:30 AM Garrett Cooper wrote:
>> >> Author: ngie
>> >> Date: Thu Feb  5 11:38:29 2015
>> >> New Revision: 278249
>> >> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/278249
>> >>
>> >> Log:
>> >>  Honor the following flags with the following rc.d scripts for services
>> >>
>> >> that can be easily decoupled from the boot process without disrupting
>> >> other
>> >> services
>> >>
>> >>  - MK_APM && MK_ACPI: powerd
>> >>  - MK_BOOTPARAMD: bootparams
>> >>  - MK_FTP: ftpd
>> >>  - MK_INETD: inetd
>> >>  - MK_LEGACY_CONSOLE: moused, syscons
>> >
>> > I'm using moused with vt(4).  It is not syscons-specific.
>>
>> Unfortunately it is LEGACY_CONSOLE specific right now:
>>
>> 183242        sam # XXX MK_SYSCONS
>> 183242        sam .if ${MK_LEGACY_CONSOLE} != "no"
>> 212525        imp SUBDIR+=      kbdcontrol
>> 212525        imp SUBDIR+=      kbdmap
>> 212525        imp SUBDIR+=      moused
>> 212525        imp SUBDIR+=      vidcontrol
>> 183242        sam .endif
>>
>> This will probably need to change to be inclusive of MK_VT, but I need to
>> doublecheck the sources to make sure there aren’t any assumptions lurking
>> in moused that explicitly require syscons in order to function...
>
> Eh, which part of "I'm running moused for a trackpad on my Thinkpad that I
> use with vt(4) both in and out of X" doesn't == "it works with vt(4), not
> just sc(4)"?  :)

I guess I was just propagating around the original assumption that
using moused is tied to just syscons(4). You and emaste are right
though -- these tools should build and install when MK_LEGACY_CONSOLE
!= no || MK_VT != no (or invent a different build knob to make the
intent of the tools clearer instead of copy-pasting that pattern
around the tree).

Thanks :)!