svn commit: r292379 - in head/sys: netinet netinet6

[Steven Hartland]

On 17/12/2015 18:57, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
>    Steven,
>
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 02:29:02PM +0000, Steven Hartland wrote:
> S> Hey Gleb, sorry I didn't wait for your review, but I did ask around on what
> S> the timeout for this would be and was informed 2 weeks and as it had been
> S> over a month, with quite a bit of feedback from others in the area, all
> S> of which
> S> had been addressed I thought that was reasonable.
> S>
> S> A simple reply of "I do intend to review but don't have time yet so
> S> please wait"
> S> I think would be useful in these types of situations, as I know
> S> everyone's busy
> S> but its impossible to know what others are thinking.
>
> Of course it is my fault that I don't review everything phabricator sends
> to me, which is a lot. Because it is so easy to add a bunch of subscribers
> to a revision. However, in the good old pre-phabricator times, people used to
> send email directly to each other. Those email arrive to my regular mailbox,
> which I check as often as I can. You could ping me via email.
Ooo, do you not get the chase emails done in phabricator then, as that's 
what I used?

My apologies if that's the case.