svn commit: r286687 - head

[Julian Elischer]

On 8/13/15 12:53 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
>> On Aug 12, 2015, at 10:46 PM, Julian Elischer <julian at FreeBSD.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 8/13/15 3:00 AM, Warner Losh wrote:
>>> Author: imp
>>> Date: Wed Aug 12 19:00:47 2015
>>> New Revision: 286687
>>> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/286687
>>>
>>> Log:
>>>    Document build-tools better. Add rescue back because it builds /bin/sh
>>>    which has a build-tools target (see commit for how build-tools and
>>>    cross-tools differ).
>> really? do we build ALL of rescue? that contains most of /bin and lots of /usr/bin.
>> that's  a lot..   Can we not just build/bin/sh itself?
I was confused because you put the entry for the entire rescue. not 
the subdirectory.
> No, we don’t. Check the logs before complaining. It builds the build-tools target
> which is empty for the vast majority of rescue. It wasn’t obvious why it was there,
> until I deleted it. Then it became obvious, but I thought I’d document why.

do we build sh through rescue just to get a static binary?
It seems a rather non-obvious way to get one. but if we are building 
it that way anyhow,
maybe we should throw a whole bunch of other build time utils in there 
as well?
might speed up the compile..

>
> Warner
>