svn commit: r286223 - head/sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs

[Slawa Olhovchenkov]

On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 03:35:50AM +0800, Julian Elischer wrote:

> On 8/3/15 8:03 PM, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 12:50:19PM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
> >> For this change I don't want to get into fixing the thread0 stack size,
> >> which can be done later, just
> >> to provide a reasonable warning to the user that smaller values could
> >> cause a panic.
> > Hmm, is it limited to the thread0 only ?  I.e., would only increasing
> > the initial thread stack size be enough to boot the kernel ?  The zfs
> > threads do request larger stack size, I know this.
> >
> > Can somebody test the following patch in the i386 configuration which
> > does not boot ?
> 
> I think this is a reasonable thing to do. Thread0 (and proc0) are special.
> I don't see why giving it a specially sized stack would be a problem.

This is always do for ARM.
May be need increase stack size for Thread0 on ARM too?