svn commit: r264794 - head/release/arm
gjb at FreeBSD.org
Wed Apr 23 05:17:13 UTC 2014
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:15:14PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
> On Apr 22, 2014, at 10:12 PM, Glen Barber <gjb at FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 01:09:23AM -0400, Glen Barber wrote:
> >> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:02:03PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
> >>> Ditto. This should be backed out and you should make whoever broke this fix it in head.
> >> Well, this commit only moves where the definition is, from the script
> >> itself to the configuration file.
> >> But, to be fair, I think you broke it in r264660.
> > To clarify further, if it was you that did break it in head/, I am not
> > complaining about it - I fixed the use case I need.
> > What I *want* to happen is for the WITH_CLANG_IS_CC and
> > WITHOUT_CLANG_IS_CC to stop conflicting with WITH_GCC, and additional
> > convoluted and unnecessary knobs to go away.
> > But you already know that. :)
> Yea, see my recent posts to arm@ on that very topic. CLANG_IS_CC
> is evil and must die. There’s too many stupid special cases for
> clang in the build system, and it is really horking me off… But
> there will be fewer in about a week or so when I push my next round
> of fixes in...
Feel free to run your changes by me for testing. I'm happy to
complain^W test. :)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 834 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the svn-src-head